Skip to content
YouTube TV WNBA Multiview

Question: Am I ‘misogynist’ because I don’t want YouTube TV adding WNBA games to my multiview experience?

YouTube TV stirred up major backlash Sunday night when it forced viewers into a multiview experience that included the WNBA Finals alongside the Jets-Steelers NFL game and the Mets-Dodgers NLCS game.

Multiview, YouTube TV’s split-screen option, has been widely celebrated as a game-changer for sports fans. It allows viewers to watch multiple games simultaneously, making it perfect for jam-packed sports nights.

However, it became a source of frustration this weekend when subscribers were given no choice but to have the WNBA Finals as part of their multiview lineup.

Subscribers weren’t given the option to opt out or customize their viewing experience, despite the fact that YouTube TV prominently sponsored the WNBA Finals. With an estimated 8 million subscribers, this move left many feeling like they were being forced to boost the WNBA’s ratings.

This is what YouTube TV multiview users were forced to watch:

I guess this is what happens when you’re a sponsor of a women’s basketball league that lost $40 million in revenue this season, right?

Social media lit up with complaints from viewers who felt that YouTube TV was prioritizing its sponsorship over customer experience. Many users were upset at having the WNBA game forced onto their screens, with no option to remove it.

On Reddit, defenders of the decision—dubbed the “woke mob” by critics—dismissed the outrage, encouraging viewers to either deal with it or switch providers. One user quipped, “It’s the last WNBA game of the season, just deal with it,” while another sarcastically suggested, “Why don’t you just tape up a piece of paper over the women so you won’t be so triggered?”

Viewers have questioned whether YouTube TV’s decision to bundle the WNBA Finals with the NFL and MLB games was an attempt to inflate the WNBA’s TV ratings, a strategy that has been used in the past by networks and sponsors looking to boost viewership of certain programs. Whether this was a tactical ratings play or a mere misstep in programming remains to be seen.

For many sports fans, this incident is a reminder that streaming services, no matter how innovative, can put corporate interests over user preferences.

The controversy has left subscribers questioning whether YouTube TV’s multiview will continue to be a convenient feature or a potential source of annoyance in the future.

As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: viewers don’t want to be forced to watch something they didn’t ask for—no matter how woke or unwoke the programming might be.

Join The Chase

unfiltered, opinionated, and certainly do not care if you like it or not.

Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Back To Top

Discover more from The Liberty Line

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading