JPMorgan sex slave lawsuit spirals with alleged fake dead dad, PTSD claim, and forced threesome
The JPMorgan lawsuit continues to dominate the Twitter feed, with each day bringing us a new twist that doesn’t even seem like a real possibility. But it’s all there, and it’s my societal duty to report on it.
There are two new New York Post follow-ups on the case involving former JPMorgan banker Chirayu Rana and executive Lorna Hajdini, and somehow both sides now have more ammo.
Rana is the former JPMorgan employee the Post previously identified as the anonymous “John Doe” who sued Hajdini, accusing her of drugging him with Rohypnol and Viagra, coercing him into sex acts, threatening his career, and turning him into what the first lawsuit described as a “sex slave.”
Hajdini has denied everything. JPMorgan has denied the claims too, saying an internal investigation found no evidence supporting Rana’s accusations.
And now the Post says Rana allegedly lied to the bank about his dad being dead. Just amazing stuff here all around. Bravo.
JPMorgan Accuser Allegedly Said His Dad Was Dead
According to the Post, Rana allegedly told JPMorgan supervisors in December 2024 that his father had died so he could take paid leave.
The issue there is pretty simple. His father is alive.
The Post says it reached Rana’s father, Chaitanya Rana, at the family’s Virginia home over the weekend.
“I don’t know anything about it,” Chaitanya Rana told the Post. “He didn’t talk with us or anything.”
He also said: “He’s my son. He’s a good guy.”
That is a brutal quote in context. Not because the dad is attacking him. He isn’t. It’s because the entire thing sounds like a poor guy getting a phone call from the New York Post about his son’s insane sex lawsuit and finding out he was apparently dead in the HR paperwork.
Just a normal family Sunday.
According to Post sources, Rana allegedly told JPMorgan in fall 2024 that his father was seriously ill, then later claimed he had died. Sources said he used different forms of paid leave, including bereavement, and took nearly three months away from work.
One source told the Post: “The company thought he was working through something.”
The same source added: “You can tell that he was trying to play the system.”
Again, these are allegations and source claims from the Post, not a court ruling. But if true, holy shit, that is not exactly the credibility booster you want when you are filing one of the most graphic workplace lawsuits anyone has ever seen.
Rana’s Lawsuit Reappears With New Claims
At the same time, Rana’s lawsuit is not dead.
The Post says the filing reappeared on the Manhattan Supreme Court docket Monday after being filed, pulled, and then refiled with corrections. And Rana has now added what he claims is new evidence.
That includes anonymous witness statements.
One alleged witness, described by the Post as appearing to be a family friend, claims he was staying at an apartment in New York when Hajdini showed up in the middle of the night. According to the filing, the witness says Hajdini was “completely naked,” sat on the couch where he was sleeping, lit a cigarette, and begged him to “join them” in the bedroom.
The witness says he refused multiple times. According to the filing, Hajdini allegedly told him: “You know I own [redacted], so you better come join.”
After she returned to the bedroom, the witness claims he heard Rana pleading: “No, no, no, you have to leave. I’m not going to do this. Please stop.”
So while the Post is reporting all this credibility-damaging stuff about Rana, Rana’s side is also now saying there were people around who allegedly saw or heard pieces of what he has been claiming.
That is where this thing gets complicated as hell.
Because on one side, JPMorgan says its internal investigation found no evidence. Hajdini says she never engaged in inappropriate conduct and was never even at the alleged assault location. The Post says Rana allegedly lied about his father dying.
On the other side, Rana is now filing anonymous witness statements claiming people heard him resisting Hajdini and saw behavior that lines up with parts of his story.
Everyone involved is either lying, wrong, lawyering up, or some disgusting combination of all three.
JPMorgan Says It Found Nothing
JPMorgan has stayed pretty firm on this.
The bank says its investigation reviewed emails, phone records, witness statements, records, and devices, and found no evidence to support Rana’s allegations.
The bank also says Hajdini cooperated fully.
Rana, according to JPMorgan, did not.
That has been one of the bank’s biggest points from the beginning. JPMorgan’s position is basically that Rana made these explosive claims but refused to participate in the internal investigation or provide key details.
Corporate investigations are corporate investigations. They are not magic truth machines. But when the company says it reviewed records and found nothing, while also saying the accuser did not cooperate, that is going to be a major part of the defense.
The Power Dynamic Claim Still Has Problems
One of the biggest issues from the last Post follow-up is still sitting there like a grenade.
The original lawsuit made it sound like Hajdini had power over Rana’s bonus, promotion, and future at JPMorgan.
But the Post reported that Rana did not report to Hajdini. They were colleagues. They were under different managing directors. And now the Post says it reviewed a JPMorgan org chart showing Hajdini had no direct reports on the leveraged finance team.
That does not make every allegation impossible. It does, however, make the career-threat part harder to understand on its face.
If Hajdini did not manage Rana and had no control over his annual bonus, then the whole “I can ruin you at JPMorgan” angle becomes a lot murkier. Maybe Rana’s side has an explanation for informal influence inside the team. Maybe they don’t. But that is clearly one of the pressure points now.
The Legal Chatbot Detail Is Still Weird As Hell
The Post also brought back one of the strangest pieces of this whole thing.
Screenshots reportedly shared online allegedly showed Rana consulting a legal chatbot as early as July 2024. The Post says the chatbot exchange described similar allegations, including being raped and drugged by a boss, but named “Morgan Stanley” and referred to the abuser as “he.”
That is the kind of detail that makes people put on the tinfoil hat and start sprinting laps around the internet. Could it be nothing? Sure. Could it be damaging? Absolutely.
Because when someone files a lawsuit with allegations this severe, and there are allegedly earlier chatbot prompts describing similar claims with different details, that is going to become a giant blinking neon sign for the other side.
Rana Claims PTSD
Rana’s new filing also includes an affirmation saying he should be allowed to proceed anonymously because the alleged events left him with PTSD.
The filing includes a letter from executive psychotherapist Johnathan Alpert that claims to confirm the PTSD diagnosis.
Rana also cited a June 2025 email to Alpert where he said he had “not slept in weeks,” was “unable to eat,” heard Hajdini’s voice in his head, and feared for his safety and his family’s safety.
So that is where this case sits now.
A man accused a JPMorgan executive of horrific sexual abuse. The executive denies everything. JPMorgan says it investigated and found no merit. The Post says the accuser allegedly lied about his father dying, had a weird legal chatbot trail, and did not even report to the woman he says controlled his career.
But Rana’s updated filing now includes anonymous witness statements and PTSD documentation that he says support his claims.
So yeah, good luck making sense of this shit.
Right now, the only safe conclusion is that this case is getting uglier by the day. Every new filing and every new Post story makes it more of a mess. And if this ever actually gets to discovery, the emails, phone records, org charts, witness statements, and whatever the hell was going on in that apartment are going to matter a whole lot more than the internet’s first reaction.
Until then, this is Wall Street’s latest nightmare. A sex lawsuit, an allegedly fake dead dad, a naked alleged threesome invitation, a bank denying everything, and two sides accusing each other of basically destroying lives.
Just another normal week in finance.
Read More
Arcadia, California mayor Eileen Wang admits she was acting as foreign agent for China in plea deal
Eileen Wang, the mayor of Arcadia, California, has been charged…
Dianna Russini and her husband were photographed kissing on Mother’s Day and I have so many questions
Dianna Russini and her husband Kevin Goldschmidt were photographed kissing…
The Pentagon dropped 400+ UFO Files and I think we need to talk about the true meaning of transparency
The Pentagon started releasing declassified UFO files on Friday. Over…
There hasn’t been this much sex in finance since the Wolf of Wallstreet. I’m here for it; nerds deserve fun to. We can’t all be sports journalist and head football coaches.